References

[1] R. A. Wentworth, Energy of harmonic maps and Gardiner’s formula, in In the Tradition of Ahlfors–Bers, IV, Contemp. Math. 432 (2007), 221–229. DOI: 10.1090/conm/432/08311; Author’s version.

[2] F. Arana-Herrera, Counting square-tiled surfaces with prescribed real and imaginary foliations and connections to Mirzakhani’s asymptotics for simple closed hyperbolic geodesics, J. Mod. Dyn. 16 (2020), 81–107. DOI: 10.3934/jmd.2020004; arXiv:1902.05626.

[3] F. Arana-Herrera, Effective count of square-tiled surfaces with prescribed real and imaginary foliations in connected components of strata, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 45 (2025), 649–662. DOI: 10.1017/etds.2024.54; arXiv:2207.04091.

[4] J. Athreya, A. Bufetov, A. Eskin and M. Mirzakhani, Lattice point asymptotics and volume growth on Teichmüller space, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), 1055–1111. arXiv:math/0610715.

[5] F. Arana-Herrera, Effective mapping class group dynamics I: Counting lattice points in Teichmüller space, Duke Math. J. 172 (2023), 1437–1529. arXiv:2010.03123.

[6] P. Humphries, Distributing points on the torus via modular inverses, Quart. J. Math. 73 (2022), 1–16. DOI: 10.1093/qmath/haab015; arXiv:2003.09955.

[7] M. Pollicott and R. Sharp, Zeta functions in higher Teichmüller theory, Math. Z. 306 (2024), article 37. DOI: 10.1007/s00209-024-03437-4.

[8] D. Borthwick, C. Judge and P. A. Perry, Selberg’s zeta function and the spectral geometry of geometrically finite hyperbolic surfaces, Comment. Math. Helv. 80 (2005), 483–515. DOI: 10.4171/CMH/23.

[9] S. Edwards and H. Oh, Spectral gap and exponential mixing on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds, Duke Math. J. 170 (2021), 3417–3458. DOI: 10.1215/00127094-2021-0051.

[10] A. Gorodnik and A. Nevo, On discrepancy, intrinsic Diophantine approximation, and spectral gaps, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 36 (2024), 127–174. DOI: 10.5802/jtnb.1275; arXiv:2203.02802.

[11] R. Sharp, Convergence of zeta functions for amenable group extensions of shifts, in Dynamics: Topology and Numbers, Contemp. Math. 744 (2020), 245–257. Author’s version.

[12] M. Babillot, On the mixing property for hyperbolic systems, Israel J. Math. 129 (2002), 61–76. Full text.

[13] D. Dolgopyat, On decay of correlations in Anosov flows, Ann. of Math. (2) 147 (1998), 357–390. DOI: 10.2307/121012.

[14] A. Eskin, M. Mirzakhani and A. Mohammadi, Effective counting of simple closed geodesics on hyperbolic surfaces, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 24 (2022), 3059–3108. DOI: 10.4171/JEMS/1144.

[15] F. Luo and R. Stong, Lengths of simple loops on surfaces with hyperbolic metrics, Geom. Topol. 6 (2002), 495–521. DOI: 10.2140/gt.2002.6.495.

[16] G. McShane and I. Rivin, Simple curves on hyperbolic tori, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 320 (1995), 1523–1528. arXiv:math/0005220v1.

[17] I. Rivin, A simpler proof of Mirzakhani’s simple curve asymptotics, arXiv:math/0512066 (2005).

[18] I. Agol, J. Hass and W. Thurston, The computational complexity of knot genus and spanning area, arXiv:math/0205057, 2004 revision, Theorem 12 and Corollary 13.

[19] Y. Colin de Verdière, Spectre du laplacien et longueurs des géodésiques périodiques. II, Compositio Math. 27 (1973), 159–184. Numdam.

[20] L. Charles and J. Marché, Multicurves and regular functions on the representation variety of a surface in $\mathrm{SU}(2)$, Comment. Math. Helv. 87 (2012), 409–431. doi:10.4171/CMH/258.

[21] F. Naud, Random covers of compact surfaces and smooth linear spectral statistics, Ann. Henri Poincaré 27 (2026), 347–373. arXiv:2209.07941.

[22] D. P. Thurston, A positive basis for surface skein algebras, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 (2014), no. 27, 9725–9732. arXiv:1310.1959.

[23] M. Basok and D. Chelkak, Tau-functions à la Dubédat and probabilities of cylindrical events for double-dimers and CLE(4), J. Eur. Math. Soc. 23 (2021), 2787–2832. doi:10.4171/JEMS/1072.

[24] S. Wolpert, An elementary formula for the Fenchel–Nielsen twist, Comment. Math. Helv. 56 (1981), 132–135. doi:10.1007/BF02566203.

[25] T. Aougab, M. Lahn, M. Loving, and N. Miller, Unmarked simple length spectral rigidity for covers, arXiv:2210.16706, revised 2023.

[26] Y. U. Taylor and C. T. Woodward, 6j symbols for $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ and non-Euclidean tetrahedra, preprint (2003), revised 2005. arXiv:math/0305113.

[27] V. Turaev and A. Virelizier, On two approaches to 3-dimensional TQFTs, 2010. arXiv:1006.3501.

[28] R. M. Kashaev, The hyperbolic volume of knots from the quantum dilogarithm, Lett. Math. Phys. 39 (1997), 269–275. arXiv:q-alg/9601025.

[29] H. Murakami, An introduction to the volume conjecture, in Interactions between hyperbolic geometry, quantum topology and number theory, Contemp. Math. 541 (2011), 1–40. arXiv:1002.0126.

[30] L. D. Faddeev and R. M. Kashaev, Quantum dilogarithm, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994), 427–434. arXiv:hep-th/9310070.

[31] T. Dimofte and S. Garoufalidis, The quantum content of the gluing equations, Geom. Topol. 17 (2013), 1253–1315. arXiv:1202.6268.

[32] E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Comm. Math. Phys. 121 (1989), 351–399. doi:10.1007/BF01217730.

[33] E. Witten, Analytic continuation of Chern–Simons theory, 2010. arXiv:1001.2933.

[34] S. Gukov, Three-dimensional quantum gravity, Chern–Simons theory, and the $A$-polynomial, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0306165.

[35] T. Dimofte, Quantum Riemann surfaces in Chern–Simons theory, 2011. arXiv:1102.4847.

[36] W. D. Neumann and D. Zagier, Volumes of hyperbolic three-manifolds, Topology 24 (1985), no. 3, 307–332. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(85)90004-7.

[37] D. Futer and F. Guéritaud, From angled triangulations to hyperbolic structures, in Interactions between hyperbolic geometry, quantum topology and number theory, Contemp. Math. 541 (2011), 159–182. arXiv:1004.0440.

[38] Q. Chen and T. Yang, Volume conjectures for the Reshetikhin–Turaev and the Turaev–Viro invariants, Quantum Topol. 9 (2018), no. 3, 419–460. doi:10.4171/QT/111.

[39] D. Gang, M. Romo, and M. Yamazaki, All-order volume conjecture for closed 3-manifolds from complex Chern–Simons theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 359 (2018), 915–936. arXiv:1704.00918.

[40] K. H. Wong and T. Yang, On the volume conjecture for hyperbolic Dehn-filled 3-manifolds along the figure-eight knot, Quantum Topol. 16 (2025), no. 3, 419–491. doi:10.4171/QT/240.

[41] T. Dimofte and R. van der Veen, A spectral perspective on Neumann–Zagier, 2014. arXiv:1403.5215.

[42] D. V. Mathews and J. S. Purcell, A symplectic basis for 3-manifold triangulations, 2022. arXiv:2208.06969.

[43] D. Alessandrini, L. Liu, A. Papadopoulos, and W. Su, The behaviour of Fenchel–Nielsen distance under a change of pants decomposition, preprint (2011). arXiv:1105.0202.

[44] L. Anagnostou, S. Mullane, and P. Norbury, Weil–Petersson volumes, stability conditions and wall-crossing, preprint (2023). arXiv:2310.13281.

[45] L. Anagnostou and P. Norbury, Volumes of moduli spaces of hyperbolic surfaces with cone points, preprint (2022), version 4 (2025). arXiv:2212.13701.

[46] X. Bao and F. Bonahon, Hyperideal polyhedra in hyperbolic 3-space, Bull. Soc. Math. France 130 (2002), no. 3, 457–491. doi:10.24033/bsmf.2426.

[47] G. Belletti and T. Yang, Asymptotics of quantum $6j$-symbols and generalized hyperbolic tetrahedra, J. Topol. 18 (2025), no. 3, e70033. doi:10.1112/topo.70033.

[48] T. Budd, Irreducible metric maps and Weil–Petersson volumes, Comm. Math. Phys. 394 (2022), 887–917. doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04418-6.

[49] T. Budd, T. Meeusen, and B. Zonneveld, A tree bijection for the moduli space of genus-0 hyperbolic surfaces with boundaries, preprint (2025). arXiv:2512.09722.

[50] S. Charbonnier, F. David, and B. Eynard, Local properties of the random Delaunay triangulation model and topological 2D gravity, preprint (2017), version 3 (2018). arXiv:1701.02580.

[51] Q. Chen and J. Murakami, Asymptotics of quantum $6j$ symbols, preprint (2017), revised 2021. arXiv:1706.04887v3.

[52] F. Costantino, 6j-symbols, hyperbolic structures and the Volume Conjecture, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 1831–1854. arXiv:math/0611399.

[53] P. Deligne and G. D. Mostow, Monodromy of hypergeometric functions and non-lattice integral monodromy, Publ. Math. IHES 63 (1986), 5–89. Numdam original article.

[54] NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Airy functions, hypergeometric functions, elliptic integrals, and coalescing saddles, Sections 9.5, 15.10, 19.12, and 36.12. Airy contour integrals; Hypergeometric connection formulas; elliptic logarithmic expansions; uniform approximations of integrals.

[55] N. Do and P. Norbury, Weil–Petersson volumes and cone surfaces, Geom. Dedicata 141 (2009), 93–107. arXiv:math/0603406; doi:10.1007/s10711-008-9345-y.

[56] L. Eberhardt and G. J. Turiaci, 2D dilaton gravity and the Weil–Petersson volumes with conical defects, preprint (2023). arXiv:2304.14948.

[57] F. Fillastre, Existence and uniqueness theorem for convex polyhedral metrics on compact surfaces, survey (2010). arXiv:1011.3123.

[58] F. Fillastre, Polyhedral hyperbolic metrics on surfaces, Geom. Dedicata 134 (2008), 177–196. arXiv:0801.0538v1.

[59] W. M. Goldman, Mapping class group dynamics on surface group representations, in Problems on mapping class groups and related topics, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 74, Amer. Math. Soc. (2006), 189–214. arXiv:math/0509114.

[60] C. Guillarmou, A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas, Conformal bootstrap in Liouville theory, preprint (2020), version 2. arXiv:2005.11530.

[61] M. Heusener and J. Porti, Holomorphic volume forms on representation varieties of surfaces with boundary, Ann. H. Lebesgue 3 (2020), 341–380. arXiv:1804.07504.

[62] C. D. Hodgson, Degeneration and regeneration of geometric structures on 3-manifolds, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University (1986), vii+169 pp. Bibliographic metadata is confirmed by the author’s publication list; no numbered theorem from the thesis is used here.

[63] H. Hu and S. P. Tan, New identities for small hyperbolic surfaces, Bull. London Math. Soc. 46 (2014), no. 5, 1021–1031. arXiv:1402.1573; doi:10.1112/blms/bdu056.

[64] N. Kawazumi, A topological proof of Wolpert’s formula for the Weil–Petersson symplectic form in terms of the Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates, arXiv:2408.04937v2 (2025). arXiv:2408.04937.

[65] S. P. Kerckhoff, The Nielsen realization problem, Ann. of Math. (2) 117 (1983), 235–265. doi:10.2307/2007076.

[66] S. Kojima, Complex hyperbolic cone structures on the configuration spaces, Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste 32, suppl. 1 (2001), 149–163. arXiv:math/9907147; published article.

[67] V. Koziarz and D.-M. Nguyen, Complex hyperbolic volume and intersection of boundary divisors in moduli spaces of pointed genus zero curves, Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Super. (4) 51 (2018), 1549–1597. arXiv:1601.05252.

[68] A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas, Integrability of Liouville theory: proof of the DOZZ formula, Ann. of Math. 191 (2020), 81–166. arXiv:1707.08785.

[69] D. Lei and Y. Zhang, A note on Rivin’s interpretation of McShane’s identity as identities for closed geodesics with one self-intersection, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 32 (2023), no. 6, 2350049, 10 pp. doi:10.1142/S0218216523500499. The abstract and publisher preview were consulted for the correction; the identities used here are independently derived in Section 18.

[70] F. Luo and S. P. Tan, A dilogarithm identity on moduli spaces of curves, preprint (2011). arXiv:1102.2133.

[71] R. Mazzeo and H. Weiss, Teichmüller theory for conic surfaces, preprint (2015). arXiv:1509.07608.

[72] C. T. McMullen, The Gauss–Bonnet theorem for cone manifolds and volumes of moduli spaces, author’s manuscript, revised 24 April 2015. Author’s PDF.

[73] G. McShane, Simple geodesics and a series constant over Teichmüller space, Invent. Math. 132 (1998), 607–632. doi:10.1007/s002220050235.

[74] G. McShane, The double life of pants, draft (October 2004). Author’s PDF. See the cusp-ray and gap descriptions in Sections 3, 5, and 9.

[75] M. Mirzakhani, Simple geodesics and Weil–Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces, Invent. Math. 167 (2007), 179–222. doi:10.1007/s00222-006-0013-2.

[76] M. Mirzakhani, Weil–Petersson volumes and intersection theory on the moduli space of curves, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), no. 1, 1–23. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-06-00526-1.

[77] M. Mirzakhani, Growth of the number of simple closed geodesics on hyperbolic surfaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), 97–125. Journal article.

[78] M. Mirzakhani, Counting mapping class group orbits on hyperbolic surfaces, preprint (2016). arXiv:1601.03342.

[79] G. Mondello, Triangulated Riemann surfaces with boundary and the Weil–Petersson Poisson structure, J. Differential Geom. 81 (2009), no. 2, 391–436. arXiv:math/0610698; doi:10.4310/jdg/1231856265.

[80] G. Mondello, Poisson structures on the Teichmüller space of hyperbolic surfaces with conical points, preprint (2008), version 2 (2009). arXiv:0812.1602.

[81] G. D. Mostow, Generalized Picard lattices arising from half-integral conditions, Publ. Math. IHES 63 (1986), 91–106. Numdam original article.

[82] H. Murakami and J. Murakami, The colored Jones polynomials and the simplicial volume of a knot, Acta Math. 186 (2001), 85–104. arXiv:math/9905075.

[83] J. Murakami and M. Yano, On the volume of a hyperbolic and spherical tetrahedron, Comm. Anal. Geom. 13 (2005), no. 2, 379–400. Author’s manuscript.

[84] H. Parlier, Geodesic and orthogeodesic identities on hyperbolic surfaces, preprint (2020). arXiv:2004.09078.

[85] R. C. Penner, Weil–Petersson volumes, J. Differential Geom. 35 (1992), no. 3, 559–608. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214448257.

[86] J. Porti and H. Weiss, Deforming Euclidean cone 3-manifolds, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 1507–1538. arXiv:math/0510432.

[87] I. Rivin, Intrinsic geometry of convex ideal polyhedra in hyperbolic 3-space, in Analysis, algebra, and computers in mathematical research (Luleå, 1992), Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics 156, Dekker, New York (1994), 275–291. arXiv:math/0005234.

[88] I. Rivin, A characterization of ideal polyhedra in hyperbolic 3-space, Ann. of Math. (2) 143 (1996), 51–70. doi:10.2307/2118652.

[89] I. Rivin, Volumes of degenerating polyhedra—on a conjecture of J. W. Milnor, Geom. Dedicata 131 (2008), 73–85. arXiv:math/0512065; doi:10.1007/s10711-007-9217-x.

[90] I. Rivin, Geodesics with one self-intersection, and other stories, Adv. Math. 231 (2012), 2391–2412. arXiv:0901.2543.

[91] J. Roberts, Classical 6j-symbols and the tetrahedron, Geom. Topol. 3 (1999), 21–66. arXiv:math-ph/9812013.

[92] M. Saadi and B. Zwiebach, Closed string field theory from polyhedra, Ann. Physics 192 (1989), 213–227. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90126-7.

[93] J.-M. Schlenker, Métriques sur les polyèdres hyperboliques convexes, J. Differential Geom. 48 (1998), no. 2, 323–405. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214460799.

[94] B. Springborn, The hyperbolic geometry of Markov’s theorem on Diophantine approximation and quadratic forms, L’Enseignement Math. (2) 63 (2017), 333–373. doi:10.4171/LEM/63-3/4-5.

[95] J. Teschner, Liouville theory revisited, Classical Quantum Gravity 18 (2001), R153–R222. arXiv:hep-th/0104158.

[96] J. Teschner and G. S. Vartanov, 6j symbols for the modular double, quantum hyperbolic geometry, and supersymmetric gauge theories, preprint (2012). arXiv:1202.4698v3 (2013 version).

[97] W. P. Thurston, Shapes of polyhedra and triangulations of the sphere, Geom. Topol. Monogr. 1 (1998), 511–549. arXiv:math/9801088.

[98] X. Wang, The complex hyperbolic form as a Weil–Petersson form, preprint (2022), revised 2024. arXiv:2209.10842; doi:10.1142/S0219199724500068.

[99] B. Zonneveld, A tree bijection for cusp-less planar hyperbolic surfaces, preprint (2025). arXiv:2512.10673.

[100] B. Zwiebach, Consistency of closed string polyhedra from minimal area, Phys. Lett. B 241 (1990), 343–349. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91654-T.

[101] F. Benirschke and C. A. Serván, Isometric embeddings of Teichmüller spaces are covering constructions, Advances in Mathematics 452 (2024), 109817. Journal article. For the classical genus-two exception see Corollary 1.2(3). See also the authors’ erratum, Advances in Mathematics 489 (2026), 110831, doi:10.1016/j.aim.2026.110831; the classical genus-two isometry used here is unchanged.

[102] F. Fillastre and I. Izmestiev, Hyperbolic cusps with convex polyhedral boundary, Geometry & Topology 13 (2009), 457–492. doi:10.2140/gt.2009.13.457. Alexandrov’s sphere realization theorem is recalled as Theorem 1.1.

[103] E. Lanneau, Connected components of the strata of the moduli spaces of quadratic differentials, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure (4) 41 (2008), 1–56. Publisher text. See Sections 1.1.1–1.1.3 for period coordinates and the hyperelliptic covering constructions.

[104] A. Strömbergsson and P. Vishe, An effective equidistribution result for $SL(2,\mathbb R)\ltimes(\mathbb R^2)^{\oplus k}$ and application to inhomogeneous quadratic forms, Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2) 102 (2020), 143–204. doi:10.1112/jlms.12316; arXiv:1811.10340. The fiber Fourier orbit types used here are described in Section 4.

[105] Y. Benoist and T. Kobayashi, Tempered homogeneous spaces II, in D. Fisher, D. Kleinbock, and G. Soifer (eds.), Dynamics, Geometry, Number Theory: The Impact of Margulis on Modern Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, 2022, pp. 213–245. arXiv:1706.10131. See Lemma 2.3, Remark 2.4, and Proposition 2.6 for induction, amenability, and the matrix-coefficient estimate.

[106] M. Cowling, U. Haagerup, and R. Howe, Almost $L^2$ matrix coefficients, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 387 (1988), 97–110. doi:10.1515/crll.1988.387.97.

[107] J.-P. Otal and E. Rosas, Pour toute surface hyperbolique de genre $g$, $\lambda_{2g-2}>1/4$, Duke Mathematical Journal 150 (2009), 101–115. doi:10.1215/00127094-2009-048; arXiv:0905.0506. Theorem 2 is the finite-area statement, including residual and cuspidal eigenvalues.

[108] J. S. Athreya, J. Lagacé, M. Möller, and M. Raum, Spectral decomposition and Siegel–Veech transforms for strata: the case of marked tori, Journal of Spectral Theory 15 (2025), 895–959. doi:10.4171/JST/563; arXiv:2404.06597. Its one-relative-mark model provides a finer spectral comparison; the present affine model has two relative marked vectors.

[109] J. S. Athreya, Random affine lattices, in Geometry, Groups and Dynamics, Contemporary Mathematics 639 (2015), 169–174. doi:10.1090/conm/639/12793; arXiv:1409.6355. Lemmas 3 and 4 give the affine mean and variance formulas.

[110] H. Shiga, On the hyperbolic length and quasiconformal mappings, Complex Variables, Theory and Application 50 (2005), 123–130. doi:10.1080/02781070412331328206. Equation (1.1) recalls Wolpert’s quasiconformal length inequality.

[111] I. Bárány, G. Martin, E. Naslund, and S. Robins, Primitive points in rational polygons, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 63 (2020), 850–870. doi:10.4153/S0008439520000090; arXiv:1509.02201v2.

[112] B. H. Bowditch, Markoff triples and quasifuchsian groups, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (3) 77 (1998), 697–736. doi:10.1112/S0024611598000604.

[113] N. M. Doan, X. Li, and V. Nguyen, Stable-norm boundary geometry on once-punctured tori, preprint, version 3, 9 October 2026. arXiv:2605.14574v3. The local statements checked are Theorem 4.7 (p. 23) and Lemma 4.8 (pp. 25–26); the complete preprint proof has not been independently audited.

[114] W. Zhai, On primitive lattice points in planar domains, Acta Arithmetica 109 (2003), 1–26. doi:10.4064/aa109-1-1. The geometric hypotheses and unconditional Mertens estimate are on pp. 1–2; the paper uses the area parameter $x=L^2$.

[115] R. C. Baker, Primitive lattice points in planar domains, Acta Arithmetica 142 (2010), 267–302. doi:10.4064/aa142-3-4. Theorem 1 is conditional on RH and the geometric hypotheses (H1)–(H4).

[116] OpenAI, The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis: A Zero-Free Half-Plane $\Re s>7/8$, manuscript dated 30 September 2026. Initial-release manuscript. Theorem 1.1 was checked in the TeX source at the same revision. It is used only conditionally; its proof and formalization have not been independently verified here.

[117] OpenAI, The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis, manuscript dated 5 October 2026. Initial-release manuscript. Theorem 1.1 and the following paragraph in the TeX source at the same revision claim a zero-free half-plane $\Re s>11/12$ and describe it as an intermediate result toward the September claim. Its use here is conditional; its proof and formalization have not been independently verified.

[118] Duffin’s resistor networks, the volume of ideal polyhedra, and nearly-linear-time Laplacian solvers, companion working study, 18 September 2026; supplied snapshot of the igorrivin/ipoly repository, manuscript and numerical-verification scripts. Corrections to this preserved historical snapshot are recorded in the companion reconciliation note.

[119] R. J. Duffin, Distributed and lumped networks, J. Math. Mech. 8 (1959), 793–826.

[120] I. Rivin, Euclidean structures on simplicial surfaces and hyperbolic volume, Ann. of Math. 139 (1994), 553–580. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118572.

[121] I. Rivin, Combinatorial optimization in geometry, preprint, 1999. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9907032v1.

[122] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004, especially Chapter 11. https://stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/bv_cvxbook.pdf.

[123] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, lecture slides, path-following discussion, PDF pages 378–382. https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/bv_cvxslides.pdf.

[124] D. A. Spielman and S.-H. Teng, Nearly-linear time algorithms for preconditioning and solving symmetric, diagonally dominant linear systems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 35 (2014), 835–885. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0607105.

[125] S. Rippa, Minimal roughness property of the Delaunay triangulation, Comput. Aided Geom. Design 7 (1990), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8396(90)90011-F.

[126] V. Disarlo and H. Parlier, The geometry of flip graphs and mapping class groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), 3809–3844. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4285.

[127] J. F. Brock, The Weil–Petersson metric and volumes of $3$-dimensional hyperbolic convex cores, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), 495–535. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0109048v2.

[128] J. F. Brock, Weil–Petersson translation distance and volumes of mapping tori, Comm. Anal. Geom. 11 (2003), 987–999. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0109050.

[129] J. Porti, Reidemeister torsion, hyperbolic three-manifolds, and character varieties, arXiv:1511.00400v2 (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00400v2.