Polyhedra, Moduli,
and Quantum Geometry

Web working edition

On this page
  1. 26.1 A direct converse in the compact Selberg setting
  2. 26.2 A quantitative converse in homogeneous dynamics
  3. 26.3 A converse for a finite Markov model
  4. 26.4 Which scalar count is being estimated?
  5. 26.5 A qualitative converse from full geodesic counting
  6. 26.6 Localized counts and correlations
  7. 26.7 Nonescape and the counting time parameter

26 When counting errors imply mixing

A counting remainder can imply mixing when the counts determine an appropriate operator, or when they retain sufficiently uniform information about both endpoints of orbit segments. The following elementary converses make these hypotheses and their quantitative losses explicit. They do not identify the simple-curve counting function of Section 24 with such an operator.

26.1 A direct converse in the compact Selberg setting

There is a particularly close answer to the original trace-formula question. Let X=Γ∖ℍ2X=\Gamma\backslash\mathbb H^2 be a closed connected oriented surface of curvature −1-1. Let πX(L)\pi_X(L) count primitive hyperbolic conjugacy classes in Γ\Gamma of length at most LL. Thus the two orientations are counted separately: [γ][\gamma] and [γ−1][\gamma^{-1}] are distinct. This is the primitive-class convention in the Selberg product; see [7, Section 2.1].

Proposition 26.1 (A prime-geodesic remainder forces a mixing rate). Suppose that, for some 0<δ<120<\delta<\tfrac12, πX(L)=Li⁡(eL)+O(e(1−δ)L).\pi_X(L)=\operatorname{Li}(e^L)+O(e^{(1-\delta)L}).(26.1) Then the first positive Laplace eigenvalue satisfies λ1(X)≥δ(1−δ).\lambda_1(X)\geq\delta(1-\delta).(26.2) For every 0<r<δ0<r<\delta, the unit-speed geodesic flow gtg_t on T1XT^1X therefore satisfies |Corr⁡t(f,h)|≤CX,rSm(f)Sm(h)e−rt|\operatorname{Corr}_t(f,h)| \leq C_{X,r}S_m(f)S_m(h)e^{-rt}(26.3) for some finite Sobolev order mm. Here SmS_m is an L2L^2 Sobolev norm and the correlation uses normalized Liouville measure.

Proof. Put α=1−δ>12\alpha=1-\delta>\tfrac12. For ℜs>1\Re s>1, define F(s)=∑Pprimitiveℓ(P)e−sℓ(P)=∫0∞te−stdπX(t).F(s)=\sum_{P\ \mathrm{primitive}}\ell(P)e^{-s\ell(P)} =\int_0^\infty t e^{-st}\,d\pi_X(t). Above a fixed positive cutoff L0L_0, write πX(t)=Li⁡(et)+E(t)\pi_X(t)=\operatorname{Li}(e^t)+E(t) with E(t)=O(eαt)E(t)=O(e^{\alpha t}). Since dLi⁡(et)=etdt/td\operatorname{Li}(e^t)=e^t\,dt/t, the main term contributes e−(s−1)L0/(s−1)e^{-(s-1)L_0}/(s-1). Integration by parts gives the error contribution, up to an entire cutoff term, as ∫L0∞(st−1)e−stE(t)dt.\int_{L_0}^\infty (st-1)e^{-st}E(t)\,dt. This integral is locally uniformly convergent for ℜs>α\Re s>\alpha. Consequently F(s)−1/(s−1)F(s)-1/(s-1) is holomorphic there.

The logarithmic derivative of the Selberg product is ZX′(s)ZX(s)=∑P∑k≥1ℓ(P)e−skℓ(P)1−e−kℓ(P).\frac{Z_X'(s)}{Z_X(s)} =\sum_P\sum_{k\geq1} \frac{\ell(P)e^{-sk\ell(P)}}{1-e^{-k\ell(P)}}.(26.4) Subtracting F(s)F(s) leaves a function holomorphic for ℜs>12\Re s>\tfrac12: the terms with k≥2k\geq2 have exponent at least 2ℜs>12\Re s>1, and the k=1k=1 denominator correction supplies an extra factor e−ℓ(P)e^{-\ell(P)}. The positive systole and the counting bound justify local uniform convergence. Hence ZX′/ZX−1/(s−1)Z_X'/Z_X-1/(s-1) is holomorphic for ℜs>α\Re s>\alpha, excluding zeros of ZXZ_X there except at 11.

Every Laplace eigenvalue λj=sj(1−sj)<14\lambda_j=s_j(1-s_j)<\tfrac14, with 12<sj<1\tfrac12<s_j<1, gives a zero sjs_j of ZXZ_X; see [8, Theorems 1.1 and 4.1]. Thus sj≤1−δs_j\leq1-\delta, which proves (26.2); equality is allowed. Set s*=12s_*=\tfrac12 if there is no such positive eigenvalue, and otherwise let s*s_* be the largest such parameter. The matrix-coefficient estimate of [9, Theorem 1.1], specialized to a compact surface, gives Sobolev correlation decay at every rate below 1−s*1-s_*. Since s*≤1−δs_*\leq1-\delta, this proves (26.3). The time normalization is at=diag⁡(et/2,e−t/2)a_t=\operatorname{diag}(e^{t/2},e^{-t/2}) in PSL2(ℝ)\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbb R). ◻

Two qualifications delimit this converse. First, (26.1) contains only the leading term: an error estimate after subtracting exceptional contributions Li⁡(esjL)\operatorname{Li}(e^{s_jL}) does not exclude those small eigenvalues. Second, the conclusion concerns the complete primitive spectrum. Applying it to simple curves or coefficient-filtered counts would require a corresponding spectral identity. If geometric geodesics are counted without orientation, the main term is 12Li⁡(eL)\tfrac12\operatorname{Li}(e^L); doubling that count recovers the stated convention. The exponent is quantitative, while explicit numerical or family-uniform mixing constants require additional estimates.

26.2 A quantitative converse in homogeneous dynamics

There is an established arithmetic converse. In the SS-arithmetic setting of Gorodnik–Nevo [10, Theorems 1.4 and 5.2], let ES,m(r,B)E_{S,m}(r,B) denote the L2L^2 discrepancy of normalized rational point counts in translated real balls of radius rr and an SS-adic set BB. For a discretely embedded irreducible representation π\pi in the mean-zero automorphic spectrum, their estimate is ∥π(βB)∥≤2[ΓS:ΓS,m]mG∞(B(e,r))−1ES,m(r,B),0<r≤r0(π).\|\pi(\beta_B)\| \leq 2[\Gamma_S:\Gamma_{S,m}] m_{G_\infty}(B(e,r))^{-1}E_{S,m}(r,B), \qquad 0<r\leq r_0(\pi).(26.5) The ambient group and congruence quotients satisfy the standing algebraic hypotheses of that paper, including a connected, simply connected ℚ\mathbb Q-simple group in the notation displayed here. Here the real factor is noncompact, the places in SS are unramified, BB is bounded, positive-measure, and bi-invariant under the specified hyperspecial compact subgroup, and βB\beta_B is its normalized Haar measure. The small-radius threshold depends on π\pi. Thus sufficiently strong localized discrepancy controls averaging operators quantitatively. Their application to forms of SL2\mathrm{SL}_2 uses arithmetic counting to obtain a spectral gap. This statement is not a general implication from one scalar count to mixing of a flow.

26.3 A converse for a finite Markov model

Let AA be an irreducible nonnegative integer q×qq\times q adjacency matrix, allowing parallel edges, and let λ>0\lambda>0 be its Perron eigenvalue. The number FnF_n of periodic edge sequences fixed by the nnth shift, with a distinguished starting position, is Fn=tr⁡(An).F_n=\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}(A^n). It includes repetitions and is not the number of primitive orbits. The associated identity ζA(z)=exp⁡(∑n≥1tr⁡(An)nzn)=1det⁡(I−zA)\zeta_A(z)= \exp\left(\sum_{n\geq1}\frac{\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}(A^n)}n z^n\right) =\frac1{\det(I-zA)} is the usual finite-state trace formula; see [11, Sections 1 and 4].

Proposition 26.2 (A trace-counting remainder forces a gap). Suppose that, for a specified κ>0\kappa>0, tr⁡(An)=λn+O((λe−κ)n).\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}(A^n)=\lambda^n+ O\bigl((\lambda e^{-\kappa})^n\bigr).(26.6) Then every eigenvalue of AA other than its simple Perron eigenvalue satisfies |λj|≤λe−κ.|\lambda_j|\leq\lambda e^{-\kappa}.(26.7)

Proof. Put ρ=λe−κ\rho=\lambda e^{-\kappa}. The power series E(z)=∑n≥1(tr⁡(An)−λn)znE(z)=\sum_{n\geq1}\bigl(\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}(A^n)-\lambda^n\bigr)z^n is holomorphic for |z|<ρ−1|z|<\rho^{-1}. On its initial convergence disk, E(z)=∑j=2qzλj1−zλj,E(z)=\sum_{j=2}^q\frac{z\lambda_j}{1-z\lambda_j}, where algebraic multiplicities are included. A nonzero λj\lambda_j produces a pole at z=λj−1z=\lambda_j^{-1}. Distinct eigenvalues produce different poles, and repeated copies of one eigenvalue have the same nonzero residue and add. No pole can therefore lie inside |z|<ρ−1|z|<\rho^{-1}. Zero eigenvalues already satisfy the conclusion. ◻

To convert the gap into a mixing statement, choose positive Perron vectors r,lr,l normalized by ∑iliri=1\sum_i l_ir_i=1, and set Pij=Aijrjλri,πi=liri,Π=𝟏πT.P_{ij}=\frac{A_{ij}r_j}{\lambda r_i}, \qquad \pi_i=l_ir_i,\qquad \Pi=\mathbf1\pi^T. Then PP is stochastic, π\pi is stationary, and PP is similar to A/λA/\lambda. For every 0<κ′<κ0<\kappa'<\kappa, ∥Pn−Π∥∞≤Cκ′,Ae−κ′n.\|P^n-\Pi\|_\infty\leq C_{\kappa',A}e^{-\kappa'n}.(26.8) At the endpoint κ\kappa a polynomial factor can arise from Jordan blocks. In particular, the stationary Markov chain satisfies |𝔼π[f(X0)g(Xn)]−𝔼πf𝔼πg|≤Cκ′,Ae−κ′n∥f∥∞∥g∥∞.\left|\mathbb E_\pi[f(X_0)g(X_n)] -\mathbb E_\pi f\,\mathbb E_\pi g\right| \leq C_{\kappa',A}e^{-\kappa'n}\|f\|_\infty\|g\|_\infty. Fixed-width cylinder observables have the same decay after the corresponding time offset. Approximation by cylinder functions gives mixing of the shift, and quantitative approximation gives a rate for Hölder observables with an explicit regularity loss. For example, on the two-sided stationary vertex shift use the metric dθ(x,y)=θN(x,y)d_\theta(x,y) =\theta^{N(x,y)}, where 0<θ<10<\theta<1 and N(x,y)N(x,y) is the least |j||j| for which xj≠yjx_j\ne y_j. A β\beta-Hölder test is approximated by conditioning on coordinates −p,…,p-p,\ldots,p with error O(θβp)O(\theta^{\beta p}). The Markov property bounds the covariance of the two resulting cylinder tests at lag n>2pn>2p by O(e−κ′(n−2p))O(e^{-\kappa'(n-2p)}) times their sup norms. Taking p=⌊κ′n/(2κ′+β|log⁡θ|)⌋p=\lfloor\kappa'n/(2\kappa'+\beta|\log\theta|)\rfloor gives the rate exp⁡(−κ′β|log⁡θ|2κ′+β|log⁡θ|n).\exp\left(-\frac{\kappa'\beta|\log\theta|} {2\kappa'+\beta|\log\theta|}\,n\right). Parallel-edge observations are handled by conditioning on the adjoining vertices; a bounded change in the time offset changes only the constant.

The matrix constant can itself be bounded explicitly. If r0=e−κ<r<1r_0=e^{-\kappa}<r<1, the resolvent integral around |z|=r|z|=r gives ∥Pn−Π∥∞≤rq!(1+r)q−1(1−r)(r−r0)q−1rn.\|P^n-\Pi\|_\infty \leq \frac{r\,q!(1+r)^{q-1}} {(1-r)(r-r_0)^{q-1}}\,r^n.(26.9) Indeed, on this circle the determinant has modulus at least (1−r)(r−r0)q−1(1-r)(r-r_0)^{q-1}, while the row-sum norm of its adjugate is at most q!(1+r)q−1q!(1+r)^{q-1}. Thus a numerical counting saving produces a numerical mixing estimate in this model.

26.4 Which scalar count is being estimated?

An exact count of unrestricted paths need not imply mixing. For example, with m≥2m\geq2, A=(0mm0),𝟏TAn𝟏=2mn.A=\begin{pmatrix}0&m\\m&0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \mathbf1^T A^n\mathbf1=2m^n. This count has no error at all. Its normalized transition chain alternates between two states; the correlation of (1,−1)(1,-1) with itself is (−1)n(-1)^n. The closed-path count detects what the total path count misses: tr⁡(An)=mn+(−m)n.\mathop{\mathrm{tr}}(A^n)=m^n+(-m)^n. Thus a scalar sequence can suffice when it is a complete trace encoding of a suitable operator. The decisive issue is what the chosen count retains.

Continuous time introduces a separate return-time issue. The full shift on mm symbols has exactly mnm^n fixed points for its nnth iterate and is mixing for its Bernoulli measure. Suspend it with constant roof 11: Y=(Σ×[0,1])/((x,1)∼(σx,0)).Y=(\Sigma\times[0,1])/ \bigl((x,1)\sim(\sigma x,0)\bigr). For the suspension flow ϕt\phi^t, the mean-zero function F([x,u])=e2πiuF([x,u])=e^{2\pi i u} is well defined and satisfies F∘ϕt=e2πitF,∫F¯F∘ϕt⁡dν=e2πit.F\circ\phi^t=e^{2\pi it}F,\qquad \int\overline F\,F\circ\phi^t\,\mathop{}\!\mathrm d\nu=e^{2\pi it}. The flow is therefore not mixing. Its physical periods lie in a lattice, so this is not an example of an unoscillating continuous-time prime-orbit asymptotic. It shows why a discrete-time counting converse does not automatically pass to a suspension. Ruling out arithmetic return times is necessary; quantitative flow estimates also require control of approximate eigenfunctions or high-frequency return-time operators. The role of these additional geometric conditions is discussed in [13].

26.5 A qualitative converse from full geodesic counting

There is also a simple geometric deduction. In Babillot [12, Theorem 1], the universal cover is a simply connected complete Riemannian manifold with sectional curvature bounded above by a negative constant, and the acting discrete isometry group is non-elementary. A quasi-product measure means a flow-invariant measure whose geodesic current is in the measure class of a product of its two boundary measures. For such a measure, nonarithmeticity of the closed length spectrum implies mixing. Assume a nonzero finite such measure, normalized to probability, and suppose the full primitive closed-orbit count is finite at each cutoff and satisfies π(T)∼CehTT,C,h>0,\pi(T)\sim C\,\frac{e^{hT}}{T},\qquad C,h>0, as T→∞T\longrightarrow\infty through all real values. If all periods belonged to aℤa\mathbb Z, a>0a>0, then π(na+a/4)=π(na+3a/4),\pi(na+a/4)=\pi(na+3a/4), whereas the ratio of their proposed main terms tends to eha/2>1e^{ha/2}>1. This contradiction proves nonarithmeticity and hence qualitative mixing under the stated structural hypotheses. No rate follows from this argument. For a polynomial simple-curve main term CTdCT^d, the corresponding fixed-shift ratio tends to one, so this argument does not transfer to simple-curve counting.

26.6 Localized counts and correlations

A useful general converse applies once geometric counts are related to joint transition masses. Let (Y,d,μ)(Y,d,\mu) be a compact metric probability space, with a measure-preserving flow ϕt\phi^t. Suppose that for every 0<h≤10<h\leq1 there is a measurable partition 𝒫h={P1,…,PN(h)}\mathcal P_h=\{P_1,\ldots,P_{N(h)}\} with diam⁡(Pi)≤h,N(h)≤Bh−D.\operatorname{diam}(P_i)\leq h,\qquad N(h)\leq B h^{-D}. Zero-measure cells may be discarded. Define pij(t,h)=μ(Pi∩ϕ−tPj)p_{ij}(t,h)=\mu(P_i\cap\phi^{-t}P_j).

Proposition 26.3 (A quantitative localized converse). Assume that geometric weighted counts give, uniformly in i,j,h,ti,j,h,t, |pij(t,h)−μ(Pi)μ(Pj)|≤Ah−me−κt,m≥0,κ>0.|p_{ij}(t,h)-\mu(P_i)\mu(P_j)| \leq A h^{-m}e^{-\kappa t}, \qquad m\geq0,\quad\kappa>0.(26.10) For 0<β≤10<\beta\leq1 and bounded β\beta-Hölder functions f,gf,g, |∫fg∘ϕtdμ−∫fdμ∫gdμ|≤C∥f∥Cβ∥g∥Cβe−ηt,η=κβm+2D+β.\left|\int f\,g\circ\phi^t\,\mathop{}\!\mathrm d\mu-\int f\,\mathop{}\!\mathrm d\mu\int g\,\mathop{}\!\mathrm d\mu\right| \leq C\|f\|_{C^\beta}\|g\|_{C^\beta}e^{-\eta t}, \qquad \eta=\frac{\kappa\beta}{m+2D+\beta}.(26.11)

Proof. Replace f,gf,g by their cellwise averages fh,ghf_h,g_h. Their uniform approximation errors are at most [f]βhβ[f]_\beta h^\beta and [g]βhβ[g]_\beta h^\beta. Invariance bounds the resulting correlation error by C∥f∥Cβ∥g∥CβhβC\|f\|_{C^\beta}\|g\|_{C^\beta}h^\beta. For the step functions the centered correlation is ∑i,jfigj(pij(t,h)−μ(Pi)μ(Pj)).\sum_{i,j}f_i g_j \bigl(p_{ij}(t,h)-\mu(P_i)\mu(P_j)\bigr). There are at most B2h−2DB^2h^{-2D} terms. Equation (26.10) therefore bounds the original correlation by C∥f∥Cβ∥g∥Cβ(hβ+h−(m+2D)e−κt).C\|f\|_{C^\beta}\|g\|_{C^\beta} \bigl(h^\beta+h^{-(m+2D)}e^{-\kappa t}\bigr). Choose h=e−κt/(m+2D+β)h=e^{-\kappa t/(m+2D+\beta)}. ◻

If the right side of (26.10) contains the additional factor μ(Pi)μ(Pj)\mu(P_i)\mu(P_j), its sum costs one, and the exponent improves to κβ/(m+β)\kappa\beta/(m+\beta). The normalization of a localized count therefore materially affects the resulting rate.

The substantive hypothesis is the geometric identification of counts with pijp_{ij}. In an application one needs a formula of the form pij(t,h)=weighted segment count from Pi to Pjnormalizing growth+controlled error.p_{ij}(t,h)= \frac{\text{weighted segment count from }P_i\text{ to }P_j} {\text{normalizing growth}} +\text{controlled error}. Jacobian weights, multiplicities, boundary effects, and time-window errors must be controlled uniformly at both endpoints and at shrinking resolution hh. If the comparison error satisfies the same bound as the normalized counting error, their constants add and the proposition applies. The proposition does not supply this comparison for an arbitrary raw counting problem.

26.7 Nonescape and the counting time parameter

There is an explicit version with a noncompact tail. Suppose an exhaustion KHK_H satisfies μ(Y\KH)≤Ce−aH\mu(Y\setminus K_H)\leq C e^{-aH}, with a>0a>0. Assume that KHK_H has at most BebHh−DB e^{bH}h^{-D} cells of diameter hh, and that the entrywise bound is AecHh−me−κtA e^{cH}h^{-m}e^{-\kappa t}, where b,c,m≥0b,c,m\geq0. For bounded globally β\beta-Hölder observables the preceding argument, extending the step approximations by zero off KHK_H, gives |Corr⁡t(f,g)|≤C∥f∥Cβ∥g∥Cβ(hβ+e−aH+e(2b+c)Hh−(m+2D)e−κt).|\operatorname{Corr}_t(f,g)| \leq C\|f\|_{C^\beta}\|g\|_{C^\beta} \left(h^\beta+e^{-aH} +e^{(2b+c)H}h^{-(m+2D)}e^{-\kappa t}\right). The tail error uses invariance and the L1L^1 approximation bound; no uniform approximation on the discarded region is required. Taking h=e−ηt/βh=e^{-\eta t/\beta} and H=ηt/aH=\eta t/a yields η=κ1+(2b+c)/a+(m+2D)/β.\boxed{\displaystyle \eta= \frac{\kappa} {1+(2b+c)/a+(m+2D)/\beta}.}(26.12) These are declared sufficient hypotheses, not estimates established here for Teichmüller flow.

Finally, under the counting-time conversion R=etR=e^t, a relative power saving becomes an exponential one: O(Rd−δ)Rd=O(e−δt).\frac{O(R^{d-\delta})}{R^d}=O(e^{-\delta t}). This explains why the exponents in effective counting and mixing are related. The conversion alone gives no transition-mass identity. A converse for our curve-counting program would require the estimates to retain independent endpoint or sector weights, with controlled dependence on localization and on excursions into the noncompact part of the parameter space. Alternatively, an appropriate trace or transfer-operator representation could provide a spectral converse. Neither representation follows merely from a good remainder for the single unweighted simple-length count.